PoliStack @PoliStackAI

EO 14386 — America’s Beautiful Clean Coal: National Defense Power Purchase Agreements. This PoliStack brief follows the order from signature to implementation, including DOE actions, coal-related project funding, lobbying activity, and government targets. polistack.com/briefs/eo14386…

@katieharbath Is there any data that explains the partisan split?

New survey: What 68 campaign professionals told us about AI in politics. 87% use it daily. 33% have no policy. Dems use Claude while the GOP uses ChatGPT, Grok and Gemini more Full piece + interactive data dashboard anchorchange.substack.com/p/what-campaig…

H.R. 9080 looks small — but it shows how industrial policy often moves through procurement, not regulation. The bill would create a federal contracting preference for public buildings using innovative wood products like cross-laminated timber, mass timber, and engineered wood systems. PoliStack’s read: • 1 bipartisan Democratic cosponsor • Joint referral to Armed Services + Transportation • Sponsor not on either committee For federal buildings tied to DoD construction, an innovative-wood procurement preference fits the annual defense authorization process better than a narrow standalone bill. Full brief: polistack.com/briefs/hr9080-…

The GENIUS Act is now law — but the real fight moved to the agencies. S. 1582 passed the Senate 68–30 and House 308–122, becoming Public Law 119-27. But the implementation phase is where the stakes are now: • 14 implementing rules • 5 regulators • ~95 organizations on record • ~89% support with modifications The biggest fight: how broadly agencies interpret the interest/yield prohibition. Stablecoin policy is no longer just a crypto fight. It is now a banking, payments, deposits, and regulatory structure fight. Brief: polistack.com/briefs/s1582-g…

Cornyn vs. Paxton is not just a candidate-vs-candidate race. It is: Campaign message vs. donor base PAC support vs. small-donor intensity Candidate fundraising vs. outside-money. FEC story shows a much deeper battlefield than topline fundraising alone. polistack.com/senate/TX

Live Louisiana Senate primary results are now visible on PoliStack. Beyond the vote count, this page connects the race to the broader Senate landscape — candidates, finance, prediction-market context, and live election data in one place. 98.3% reporting as of the latest update. Track LA Senate here: polistack.com/senate/LA

@shannonrwatts Check this link for details on the Clarity Act. polistack.com/briefs/hr3633-…

New PoliStack brief: H.R. 3633 — the CLARITY Act — is close to becoming law. But the real story is how the cosponsor coalition was built. Crypto super PACs spent $4.4M+ in 2024 supporting 7 future cosponsors before the bill existed. Then: • 21 cosponsors signed on • House passed it 294–134 • all 21 cosponsors voted yes • Senate Banking ordered it reported favorably • 34 LDA filers named the bill • Circle PAC gave across both House sponsors and Senate Banking members The House-side path was largely locked before introduction. The Senate substitute is now where the execution risk lives — not whether crypto market structure passes, but in what form. Full brief: polistack.com/briefs/hr3633-…

New PoliStack brief: H.R. 8330 / S. 4340 is not just another energy bill. It is a coordinated House–Senate push to shield fossil-fuel companies from climate-damage lawsuits. We mapped: • The identical House/Senate bill text • Every sponsor and cosponsor • $1.4M+ in Energy PAC money to the 11 bill signers • $548.6M in lobbying spend from AFPM, API, NAM, and major energy companies • Trade-association policy positions that mirror the bill • Named executives, PACs, lobbyists, and donor flows behind the effort PoliStack political knowledge graph connects - bills, money, lobbying, and influence networks to provide the hidden insights. Full brief: polistack.com/briefs/hr8330-…

@mapping_ai Check this provides perspective from executive order, lobbying and regulations: polistack.com/platform/examp…

Check the link for details on TX Senate race: polistack.com/senate/TX

This is where elections actually move. $30M+ opposing Paxton $10M+ supporting Cornyn Multiple PACs targeting the same candidate This isn’t fundraising — it’s coordinated pressure. PoliStack maps the full battlefield.

GOP Primary — Fundraising Comparison Cornyn raised slightly more. But look deeper: – Higher PAC dependence – Lower small donor share – More cash on hand Paxton shows a very different base.

Paxton 59% Cornyn 41% That’s the market view. The real question: what’s driving it?

@Alex_Roarty You’re right — LLMs will shape how voters understand politics. The issue isn’t the models, it’s the data behind them. PoliStack solves that layer — turning bills, votes, donors, PACs, lobbying, and outcomes LLMs can reason over. Would value your take — happy to give you access.

Really interesting—especially the finding that committee membership can outweigh ideology in shaping behavior. This is exactly where structured, connected data becomes powerful. Curious how you see datasets like CongressData evolving into more real-time, decision-oriented tools rather than retrospective analysis.

Money is only half the story. Here’s where it shows up in legislation: • Iran sanctions bills • Israel-related policy • Anti-ICC / Anti-BDS • Defense & State Dept funding From dollars → to bills → to outcomes. That full chain is what PoliStack tracks.

What’s actually being lobbied? Not what’s said publicly — what’s prioritized: • Foreign Relations • Defense • Budget / Appropriations • Homeland Security The shape of influence is clear. PoliStack connects money → issues → policy.